What I wrote at Lib Dem Voice

June 12, 2007

The truth about recycling, according to the Economist

One of the questions that’s - quite reasonably - asked by recycling-sceptics is: prove it’s more environmentally friendly to recycle than to throw away, given the respective consumption of energy in both processes.

So I was particularly interested in a long feature in this week’s Economist, The truth about recycling. It’s worth reading in full, but I thought I’d fillet it a bit… First, here comes the science:
… the Technical University of Denmark and the Danish Topic Centre on Waste conduct[ed] a review of 55 life-cycle analyses, all of which were selected because of their rigorous methodology. The researchers then looked at more than 200 scenarios, comparing the impact of recycling with that of burying or burning particular types of waste material. They found that in 83% of all scenarios that included recycling, it was indeed better for the environment.

Based on this study, WRAP [the Waste & Resources Action Programme, a non-profit British recycling company] calculated that Britain's recycling efforts reduce its carbon-dioxide emissions by 10m-15m tonnes per year. That is equivalent to a 10% reduction in Britain's annual carbon-dioxide emissions from transport, or roughly equivalent to taking 3.5m cars off the roads.
The question then to be asked is: if it’s worthwhile doing, is this something which can be supported by the market? (Ie, is there a profit which will enable a company to benefit society while benefiting its shareholders.) The answer appears to be: no.
… most kerbside recycling programmes are not financially self-sustaining. The cost of collecting, transporting and sorting materials generally exceeds the revenues generated by selling the recyclables, and is also greater than the disposal costs. Exceptions do exist … largely near ports in dense urban areas that charge high fees for landfill disposal and enjoy good market conditions for the sale of recyclables.
So, we have here a system which reduces Britain’s carbon dioxide emissions, but which cannot turn a profit - something I guess most of us would regard as market failure, and, therefore, a candidate for government action.

Then there’s the question of China - does all our hard recycling work simply end up in Chinese landfill? This seems harder to assess. On the one hand,
Pieter van Beukering, an economist who has studied the trade of waste paper to India and waste plastics to China: “as soon as somebody is paying for the material, you bet it will be recycled.” In fact, Dr van Beukering argues that by importing waste materials, recycling firms in developing countries are able to build larger factories and achieve economies of scale, recycling materials more efficiently and at lower environmental cost. He has witnessed as much in India, he says, where dozens of inefficient, polluting paper mills near Mumbai were transformed into a smaller number of far more productive and environmentally friendly factories within a few years.
But:
… factories in developing nations may be less tightly regulated, and the recycling industry is no exception. China especially has been plagued by countless illegal-waste imports, many of which are processed by poor migrants in China's coastal regions. They dismantle and recycle anything from plastic to electronic waste without any protection for themselves or the environment. The Chinese government has banned such practices, but migrant workers have spawned a mobile cottage industry that is difficult to wipe out … Because this type of industry operates largely under the radar, it is difficult to assess its overall impact. But it is clear that processing plastic and electronic waste in a crude manner releases toxic chemicals, harming people and the environment—the opposite of what recycling is supposed to achieve.
And, finally, there is a sting in the tail for the UK. Perhaps the first product many of us got used to recycling, usually at the local supermarket before kerbside collections took over, was the green bottle - this country is, after all, the biggest importer in the world of wine (1 billion litres a year):
But with only a tiny wine industry of its own, there is little demand for the resulting glass. Instead what is needed is clear glass, which is turned into bottles for spirits, and often exported to other countries. As a result, says Andy Dawe, WRAP's glass-technology manager, Britain is in the “peculiar situation” of having more green glass than it has production capacity for. Britain's bottle-makers already use as much recycled green glass as they can in their furnaces to produce new bottles. So some of the surplus glass is down-cycled into construction aggregates or sand for filtration systems. But WRAP's own analysis reveals that the energy savings for both appear to be “marginal or even disadvantageous”.
But as the success of recycling in this country is measured by the Government not by the energy saved but by the total tonnage of recylables collected there is a perverse incentive for local councils to continue to invest in bottle recycling!

15 comments:

Paul Walter said...

I thought you were soft-peddling this blog? You seem to be still on a roll and this posting certainly elegantly answers the question: "What is Stephen Tall for?"

If you didn't see it, you might be interested in this fascinating article in the Guardian Weekend from April, where the journalist went to China on the trail of what happens to our discarded plastic bags.

Paul Walter said...

Link is:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianweekly/story/0,,2050008,00.html

Tim Worstall said...

I think you've missed two rather major things here.

1) The WRAP report does not look, as you seem to think, at kerbside domestic recycling. Instead, those CO2 emissions saved are those from the recycling we "already" do. Cars recycled for the steel, cans for the aluminium and so on, well known to be effective and yes, the market does unaided, support exactly these activities.

To take the results of what we already do and project them onto what we might do in the future doesn't really work. For the recycling we're recommendingin hte future is different from the stuff we already do, see?

(I'm also rather disturbed by The Economist stating that landfills give of methane. That hasn't been true since the 2004 Landfill Act, it's collected and used to create energy.)

2) Everyone always leaves out by far the largest cost of such schemes. The time it takes to sort the materials by households. If this is only 15 minutes per household per week (which studies show is the average, without including food and garden waste) then that alone costs more than the entire current disposal system.

Liberal Polemic said...

Stephen,

I nearly blogged about this article myself.

I actually found the Leader most depressing:

Britain imports too much green glass (all that wine), which is wastefully ground into aggregates and sand for building; it would be more economically efficient and environmentally friendly to throw the bottles away.

Sigh! Now I'm in the agonising position of wondering whether I best serve the environment by not recycling my (many, many) wine bottles.

But if I go down that root, my brain might explode from the constant need to second guess the advice to do what is anyway an onerous task!

pedro velasquez said...

The Economist looks into the truth about recycling and they have discovered some neat things. Of course, sportsbook there are some complications with recycling, and it’s important to remind ourselves that nothing is perfect, but it’s good that we aim for perfection. Recycling is a really really good thing to do. Based on this study, WRAP calculated that Britain’s recycling efforts reduce its carbon-dioxide emissions by 10m-15m tonnes per year. That is equivalent to a 10% reduction in Britain’s bet nfl annual carbon-dioxide emissions from transport, or roughly equivalent to taking 3.5m cars off the roads. Similarly, America’s Environmental Protection Agency estimates that recycling reduced the country’s carbon emissions by 49m tonnes in 2005. Recycling has many other benefits, too. sportsbook It conserves natural resources. It also reduces the amount of waste that is buried or burnt, hardly ideal ways to get rid of the stuff. (Landfills take up valuable space and emit methane, a potent greenhouse gas; and although incinerators are not as polluting as they once were, they still produce noxious emissions, http://www.enterbet.com so people dislike having them around.) But perhaps the most valuable benefit of recycling is the saving in energy and the reduction in greenhouse gases and pollution that result when scrap materials are substituted for virgin feedstock. “If you can use recycled materials, you don’t have to mine ores, cut trees and drill for oil as much,” says Jeffrey Morris of Sound Resource Management, a consulting firm based in Olympia, Washington

Lots in Costa Rica said...

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I think I will leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Ephesus said...

I loved every moment of our tour. Istanbul, cappadocia and ephesus are fantastic city. We saw so many historical places and guide was very informative. We definitely recommend it. http://www.packagetoursturkey.com - http://www.touroperatoristanbul.com We visited Istanbul for the first time on your tour turkey tours we are from Cappadocia tours Greece and we just loved it! istanbul tours We finally were able to see sights that we had only heard from istanbul tourism friends who visited I have to say that this trip was fantastic. I had a great time in Turkey. Everything went on very well actually much better than we expected istanbul travel Our guide was very friendly and ephesus tours he knew all details of history. Thanks for erything.

Green Parks said...

Hello.. Firstly I would like to send greetings to all readers. After this, I recognize the content so interesting about this article. For me personally I liked all the information. I would like to know of cases like this more often. In my personal experience I might mention a book called Green Parks Costa Rica in this book that I mentioned have very interesting topics, and also you have much to do with the main theme of this article.

pedro velasquez said...

MEGAN MCARDLE is essentially right in claiming that the academic and entertainment fields are so liberal as to make conservative members uncomfortable. Oddly, though,dominical costa rica tours she fails to note that people who choose to enter academia or entertainment generally make this choice in their early 20s, when a person's political ideology tends to become fixed. Work experience has an enormous influence on this development, not just as a result of the people one is surrounded by, but because of the nature of the values and practices that are built into an occupation.
http://www.dominicalcostaricatours.com

Anonymous said...

aaa blogs good niice
Dilber Ay yıldızın arşivlik filmlerini yeşilçamın ateşlibebesini turkseksini izlemeeye değervideosuları

Mohtasham said...

its a pleasure reading all these informative things. I really appreciate your mindset man, please tell me how can i contact you, because your articles are always informative and cool for learning, they always increase my knowledge chicken biryani recipe sms hindi friendship sms sms jokes latest sms winrar free download

okey oyna said...

film izle sosyal imleme bilgisayar mp3 dinle web tasarım

Unknown said...

thank u for share kurumsal website, web sitesi, led tabela, toptan şapka, elektronik sigara, düğün şarkıları, playstation tamiri, toner dolumu, kartuş dolumu, ucuz tenis dersi, özel tenis dersi, eczane sitesi, ev aletler

gümüş yüzükler said...

Buhara Gümüş , gümüş ürünler kategorisinde gümüş yüzükler , kolyeler , bileklikler , isimli takılar , gümüş saatler , hediyelik ürünler ve kişiye özel gümüş ürünler satışı yapan

( www.buharasilver.com ) un kurumsal web sayfasıdır. Sitemize gümüş ürünlerimizin sadece tanıtımı ve bilgilendirilmesi yapılmaktadır. Sipariş vermek ve

online satın almak için Buhara Silver ( www.buharasilver.com ) adresini ziyaret ediniz..

imtihan said...

pedofili porno
porno izle
sikiş izle
hard porno
vintage porno
anal porno izle
sohbet, sex sohpet, sex chat, sex çet, gay sohbet, gabile sohbet, lezbiyen chat, geveze sex sohbet, cinsel sohbet, gabile çet, gay çet, gay sohbet kanalı, gay sohpet, cinsel sohpet, gay chat, live sohbet, kelebek gay chat, kelebek gay çet, marcinal sohbet, marcinal çet, kelebek görüntülü çet, kelebek canlı çet